Of course, the best retrospective meetings are done face-to-face using real whiteboards, post-its or other physical objects to help teams collaborate, focus and discuss.
Yet, given the current challenging worldwide remote working situation because of COVID-19, this is not always possible. Thus, we’ve advanced the release of a first version of our remote retrospective solution. This way you can capture your team's feedback and resulting action items remotely using Targetprocess, without needing to spend money and time on learning other tools.
Let’s see how to run a remote retrospective in Targetprocess.
First, here is the collection of entities in Targetprocess that are relevant to Retrospectives.
The Team Iteration (a.k.a the Sprint) serves as the parent entity holding all the work items, in which we create a new Retrospective entity.
The Retrospective entity will contain the Feedback and Action Items.
The Feedback items are used to capture the thanks, thoughts, opinions or things to discuss that team members care about. Just a title is usually enough, but visuals can also be attached like with any entity in Targetprocess.
The Action Items represent things that you want to improve on and which can be connected as a reference for future follow-ups to another Team Iteration, usually one that represents a future Team Iteration.
Next, there is functionality on the Retrospective item that allows you to perform a remote happiness score check.
A common retrospective check-in activity is to measure the individual and average happiness score of the team and to briefly discuss any outliers. To use this functionality, open the detailed view of your retrospective entity and click on the playing cards icon (it’s in the top right corner). This will open the Happiness measurement tool. When started, it will look like this.Click on “Copy Session Link” and send this hyperlink (that is now in your clipboard) to your team members using email or any other communication tool such as Slack or MS Teams.
When a team member opens the link on their computer or mobile device, they will see this view and can select their happiness level.
Once all the scores are in, the session facilitator can click “show results” and the individual votes, as well as the team’s average will be displayed and can be discussed. When applied, the results will be stored in a comment on the retrospective item for future reference.
When it’s time in your retrospective to collect feedback from the team, point them to this board that you’ve set up previously.
Any team member can easily add their feedback to the board using the quick-add functionality in any column.
After each team member has provided his/her feedback or the set time is up, the board will reflect collected team responses and eventually look like this.
Organize Feedback into Action Items
Next, you can switch to the “Feedback to Action Items” board to create Actions Items from the collected feedback and link them to each other.
Plan Action Items for Follow-up
As a team you decide which Action Items to pick for the next iteration or to keep for a future reference. Here is how you link a selected Action Item to a respective Team Iteration.
Now you can see the Action Items right there on your Sprint backlog dashboard.
A good retrospective is made up of much more than just this. But from the perspective of feedback collection and Action Item creation, using Targetprocess is as simple as that.
Future Enhancements & Configuration Options
In the example above we used the configuration for the common "Well, Not Well, Idea" retrospective feedback categories. However, in a similar way you can use "Mad, Sad, Glad", the Starfish categories "Start, Stop, Continue, More of, Less of" or any other you prefer. Just add more categories yourself by creating new custom fields in the Feedback entity you use for a retrospective.
See how Targetprocess aligns and empowers business and IT with the help of powerful integrations.
Targetprocess facilitates enterprise agility at all levels by enabling both Business and IT to work in one holistic solution. To help ensure value flow visibility and collaboration across the entire enterprise, Targetprocess allows a powerful set of integrations covering use cases for different levels and roles within organization.
For Transparency above the Team Level EXPAND 2 INTEGRATIONS
For Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery EXPAND 6 INTEGRATIONS
For Product Management, ITSM, Sales and Marketing to Stay on the Same Page EXPAND 5 INTEGRATIONS
Experts and clients say More Reviews & Case Studies
Targetprocess is recognized as a Leader in Gartner’s 2020 Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools and included in the related Critical Capabilities for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools*Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, express or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
We have been using Targetprocess for more than three years by now and still been surprised when our teams find news ways and work areas to use it…
It is really so flexible that we can nearly model and effectively use in each workflow we need. New departments request me from time to time to show them “that tool you have with nice cards ☺Jorge Rivero SanchezInnovation Director
I love how adaptable and flexible Targetprocess is. It meets the various needs of so many different departments within our organization. We manage all of our IT, creative and legal workflow through Targetprocess. It’s helped create a centralized location for our cross-department needs – as well as providing a history of our work.Katie MacCabeAssistant Director
I used Targetprocess at some very large multi-team multi-program clients and had a consistently good experience.
I’ve got a lot of experience of Jira, Rally, PivotalTracker, Trello, Mingle and open source agile lifecycle management tools. I like Targetprocess better – it covers a lot more ground, the information architecture is really consistent, it’s solid as a rock and fast too. Best of breed.Peter MerelCTO and Agile Coach
a sales representative
Get a live
Let one of our product specialists create your account
and shape Targetprocess for your company needs.